Extract from Dorset Proceedings Vol. 87 Pages 114/115

By R. A. H. FARRAR, M.A., F.S.A.


The first part of this note is based on a description and sketch plan kindly supplied by the Curator of the County Museum, Mr. R. N. R. Peers(1). In 1963 two inhumations were found in building flats (SY 486895) in the garden on the south side of the Bridport Road opposite a private house (The Retreat) west of the Anchor inn, Burton Bradstock. The site is about 50ft. above Ordnance Datum, at the junction of the Bridport/Yeovil Sands and the Inferior Oolite Limestones. The Curator was notified by the police, and the first burial was promptly examined by him on 26/27 June, but much of the remains had been removed.
The first grave lay 51ft. south of the road and 6ft. east of the N.E. corner of the new building on the east side of the site. The second (16/17 July) lay some yards to the N.W., about 2lft. south of the road and 39ft. east of the N.E. corner of the adjacent building to the N.W.

Skeleton no. I lay on its right side, at a depth of about 2ft. before the ground was levelled, and was aligned at about 3l2°, i.e. with head almost due N.W. The legs were tightly flexed, at a right angle to the spine, and the right arm, at least, was extended alongside the body. The right half of the mandible was recovered, with sound teeth

indicating an individual aged between 14 and 21 and probably about 16, according to a dental surgeon. Fragments of charcoal,
six amorphous coarse ware sherds and one fragment of iron (nail?) were found above the body, which was accompanied by a miniature jar placed, apparently upright, by the head, and a bowl, position unknown, of Maiden Castle 'war cemetery' type. Parts of both vessels are missing but the fresh breaks show that they were intact before discovery (Fig. I).

1. Thanks are due to the builder, Mr. Rosamund of Shipton Gorge, for his ready cooperation, and to Dr. Blades, County Pathologist, and Mr. White of the County Library, for their assistance.
Skeleton no. 2 lay in a grave 6ft. long at a depth of between 2 and 3ft. and had been partly excavated by Mr. White of the Dorset County Library before overnight disturbance. Up to that time no pottery had been found, and the burial was presumably unaccompanied. From reports and what remained of the vertebrae Mr. Peers was able to determine that the body had been fully extended with hands crossed over the abdomen, in an alignment of about 295°, i.e. W.N.W. with head slightly tilted to the right. There was said to have been some charcoal over the skeleton. Dr. A. N. Blades, County Pathologist, kindly sectioned the skull and reported that it showed thickening and irregularity with increased bony trabeculation, possibly due to Paget's disease.
Dating. Fully extended inhumation was the normal rite in the region in the Roman period. A degree of flexing of the lower limbs, as in skeleton no. 1. frequently occurs in the same period, although more characteristic of the preceding Early Iron Age. Although both vessels accompanying burial 1 are of types developed in the Iron Age 'C' phase, they remained popular after the Roman conquest for an indefinite period and the writer is unaware of an instance of the miniature version of the Durotrigian bead-rim jar in a pre-Roman context. Both burials probably belong, therefore, to the Roman period, and burial no. I more probably to the 1st century AD. than later. A coin of Constans, found by Mrs. V. E. C. Young in her garden at 10 Barr Lane, Burton Bradstock, was identified by Dr. J. P. C. Kent as type LRBC, 1, 133 of c. A.D. 34l(1)


No. 1. Hand-made bead-rim jar of Brailsford's Durotrigian type 4, but in miniature; fairly hard sandy black or dark grey body, discoloured brown on surfaces. The vessel appears rather worn, and little remains of the characteristic burnished surface except on the inside of the rim.
No. 2. Hand-made bead-rim bowl of Maiden Castle 'war cemetery' type (Brailsford's type 1), with under-base decoration; fairly hard sandy dark grey body, with a thin brick-red zone or 'rind' below a dark grey to black surface in part discoloured light grey externally. The vessel was horizontally burnished outside and on the upper part of the interior; the matt underside of the base, within the foot-ring, carries two burnished crosses (with bars respectively 5mm. and 8mm. wide) superimposed to form an asterisk (2). The matt interior, stippled conventionally in the drawing, shows faint erratic striations probably produced by the potter wiping out the bowl before drying.
An interesting problem of technique is raised by the marked colour contrast between the dense black of the burnished surfaces and the dark grey of the matt, particularly noticeable where the irregular tool marks impinge upon the latter. The exact coincidence with the tooling rules out 'fuming'-the deposition of carbon particles in a damp and smoky kiln-as a special cause; likewise the application of an iron-rich slip, or the employment by the potter of a wet-hand or 'slurry' finish to bring up the clay fraction to cover a gritty clay body. The writer owes to Mr. H. M. W. Hodges the suggestions that it may be due (i) to burnishing with a piece of kidney haematite, which could leave a deposit turning to magnetite on firing in a reducing atmosphere; (ii), as seems more likely, to failure, in firing, to burn out carbon from the areas rendered more resistant by burnishing; or (iii) a combination of both. Exposure to hotter gases could explain the light grey discolouration. Mr. Hodges has kindly undertaken to test these hypotheses.

1. Carson, Hill and Kent, Late Roman Bronze Coinage (1960)
2. Single crosses occur on examples from Maiden Castle and elsewhere.

Back to index